Timeline for Do Abelian varieties isomorphic to all their conjugates descend?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 28, 2017 at 1:40 | comment | added | David Lampert | It's from the long exact Galois cohomology sequence of $1 \rightarrow \{\pm1\} \rightarrow \overline{\mathbb{Q}}^* \rightarrow \overline{\mathbb{Q}}^* \rightarrow 1$. The descent obstruction is in $H^2(Aut(A))$. | |
Jul 28, 2017 at 0:53 | comment | added | jacob | Ah, of course, you're right. Can you explain your exact sequence at the beginning and where the obstruction lives exactly? I ultimately care about A=E^r, so it has a gigantic automorphism group unfortunately. | |
Jul 27, 2017 at 20:36 | comment | added | David Lampert | Doesn't the argument apply to unpolarized varieties? Shimura refers to generic polarized varieties, and a polarization is required to define a moduli variety. Note Shioda's "Question 2" with the example of elliptic curves $E_1,E_2$ defined over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ such that $E_1 \times E_1 \ncong E_1 \times E_2$ over $\mathbb{C}$ but the reductions are isomorphic over $\mathbb{F}_{p^2}$ for all $p \equiv 3$ mod(4). | |
Jul 27, 2017 at 18:50 | comment | added | jacob | I checked the paper, and it looks like Shimura's theorem deals with polarized abelian varieties. | |
Jul 27, 2017 at 18:37 | history | edited | David Lampert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 109 characters in body
|
Jul 27, 2017 at 18:32 | history | answered | David Lampert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |