Timeline for Is $\beta \mathbb{N}$ homeomorphic to its own square?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2017 at 7:51 | answer | added | M.González | timeline score: 5 | |
| S Jul 26, 2017 at 8:05 | history | suggested | Martin Sleziak |
added (stone-cech) tag
|
|
| Jul 26, 2017 at 7:51 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | This seems related: Why is $\beta(\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N})\neq\beta(\mathbb{N})\times\beta(\mathbb{N})$? (math.SE) | |
| Jul 26, 2017 at 7:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 26, 2017 at 8:05 | |||||
| Jul 26, 2017 at 6:04 | answer | added | მამუკა ჯიბლაძე | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jul 25, 2017 at 22:35 | answer | added | YCor | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jul 25, 2017 at 20:48 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | I don't have the leisure at the moment to develop this, but I'd be tempted to work on the other side of Stone duality. $\beta N$ is the Stone space of the Boolean ring $P N$ and $\beta N \times \beta N$ is the Stone space of the tensor product of commutative rings $P N \otimes P N$. My thinking is to show the latter can't possibly be complete as a Boolean algebra. | |
| Jul 25, 2017 at 20:06 | comment | added | Qfwfq | @Asaf: okay: done. | |
| Jul 25, 2017 at 20:06 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
| Jul 25, 2017 at 19:59 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila♦ | @Qfwfq: If you're fixin' the title, might as well fix the body also... | |
| Jul 25, 2017 at 19:51 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
made title more informative
|
| Jul 25, 2017 at 19:46 | answer | added | Taras Banakh | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jul 25, 2017 at 19:34 | comment | added | MathsAlppila | I appreciate it Taras...in any case I would like to know a map if it exists... | |
| Jul 25, 2017 at 19:32 | comment | added | Taras Banakh | Instead of putting negative marks better write an answer. Otherwise this will be a discouraging experience for MathsAlppila. The question seems to be reasonable and not entirely trivial. | |
| Jul 25, 2017 at 19:23 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 25, 2017 at 21:19 | |||||
| Jul 25, 2017 at 19:18 | history | asked | MathsAlppila | CC BY-SA 3.0 |