Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Jun 12, 2010 at 18:38 vote accept Arturo Magidin
Jun 10, 2010 at 18:39 comment added Arturo Magidin In Herstein's "Topics"(in Spanish, 1988); the exercises in Section 2.3 include: prove that a semigroup with right identity and right inverses is a group (problem 12); prove that right identity and left inverses do not yield a group (problem 13); prove that a finite semigroup with both cancellation laws is a group (problem 14); show that a single cancellation law does not suffice (problem 16); prove that if we drop "finite" in problem 14 then the cancellation laws do not suffice (problem 17). Hungerford (section I.2) probem 15 is the same as 14 and 17 from Herstein. No thers I can see.
Jun 10, 2010 at 18:32 answer added Arturo Magidin timeline score: 16
Jun 10, 2010 at 18:20 comment added Gerhard Paseman The cex would be not just infinite, but torsion-free. This sounds vaguely like a homework problem in Hungerford or Herstein. Does anyone know the difference between those homework problems and this formulation? Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2010.06.10
Jun 10, 2010 at 18:18 comment added Homology oops, sorry then!
Jun 10, 2010 at 18:14 comment added Yemon Choi @Homology - the original question observes that any counterexample, if it exists, would have to be infinite
Jun 10, 2010 at 17:56 comment added Homology If $S$ is finite, there exists $e$ s.t. $e^n=e$ for some $n>1$ (by iterating $x \mapsto x^2$), so $e^{n-1}a=a$ for every $a$ in $S$, and you can finish in the same way. So if a counterexample exists, it has to be infinite...
Jun 10, 2010 at 16:59 history asked Arturo Magidin CC BY-SA 2.5