Timeline for A Point-free probability theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2017 at 19:07 | comment | added | Stefan Perko | Well, I don't have access to that book. From the ToC it seems it is more about replacing the boolean algebra ($\sigma$-algebra standin) with something else entirely. This may be interesting, but I myself right now don't know why. | |
| Jul 24, 2017 at 12:51 | history | edited | Henry.L | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Jul 24, 2017 at 12:51 | comment | added | Henry.L | @StefanPerko As I understood the reference he pointed out is not even close to point-free theory that you want, Gerenander's book will be a better reference than that one. | |
| Jul 24, 2017 at 12:49 | comment | added | Stefan Perko | Regardless, thank you for your input as well. - Arguably, pointfree "something" is not an algebraic thing. It is actually dual to something algebraic (cf. the definition of the category of locales) and therefore rather geometric. Or so is my very rough understanding of this issue. | |
| Jul 24, 2017 at 12:44 | comment | added | Stefan Perko | "I do not think the accepted answer is a complete one." - I did not expect anyone to give a 'complete' answer. I was okay with an answer like that after almost a year of this question being formally unanswered. | |
| Jul 24, 2017 at 12:26 | history | answered | Henry.L | CC BY-SA 3.0 |