Timeline for Can one define quantized universal enveloping algebras in a basis-free way?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2022 at 8:32 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | The link in Qiaochu's comment is broken, here's a replacement: arxiv.org/abs/0705.4571 | |
| Jul 20, 2017 at 14:00 | comment | added | LSpice | @Gro-Tsen, sorry; I didn't mean to say that it was a duplicate (the answers seem meaningfully different), literally just that it appeared to be an interesting related question. | |
| Jul 20, 2017 at 0:11 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | Quantum geometric Satake can at least recover the category of representations of the quantum group, not sure if it can recover the fiber functor as well: front.math.ucdavis.edu/0705.4571 | |
| S Jul 19, 2017 at 22:25 | history | suggested | Konstantinos Kanakoglou |
one tag added
|
|
| Jul 19, 2017 at 22:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 19, 2017 at 22:25 | |||||
| Jul 19, 2017 at 22:13 | comment | added | Gro-Tsen | @LSpice Good catch, I wouldn't object to my question being marked as a duplicate, although André Henriques's question is perhaps more restrictive, but Theo Johnson-Freyd's answer to it is definitely enlightening. I'll let other people decide whether to close this. | |
| Jul 19, 2017 at 21:37 | comment | added | მამუკა ჯიბლაძე | Probably Vogel's approach could be used - it builds only on invariant quantities like Casimir eigenvalues. Quantization has been worked on by Westbury | |
| Jul 19, 2017 at 21:36 | comment | added | LSpice | A related question? mathoverflow.net/questions/105221/… | |
| Jul 19, 2017 at 21:34 | answer | added | Francois Ziegler | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jul 19, 2017 at 21:09 | answer | added | Konstantinos Kanakoglou | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 19, 2017 at 19:28 | history | asked | Gro-Tsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |