Timeline for Geometric interpretation of trace
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2018 at 2:44 | comment | added | PrimeRibeyeDeal | Though trace is not invariant under any permutation of the matrices in a product, just cyclic permutations. | |
| Sep 20, 2017 at 8:15 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 61 characters in body
|
| Jul 21, 2017 at 12:29 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 106 characters in body
|
| Jul 15, 2017 at 11:48 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2017 at 11:51 | comment | added | Ivan Di Liberti | About the first point, I thought important to observe that "One could look for a geometric interpretation in $k^n$, here the thesis is that trace is all about geometry of $\text{M}(n,k)$". | |
| Jul 13, 2017 at 11:49 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Your first point was already made in this answer: mathoverflow.net/a/13550. Your last point is nice though | |
| Jul 13, 2017 at 10:41 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jul 13, 2017 at 10:14 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2017 at 9:38 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 245 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2017 at 9:28 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 279 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2017 at 9:19 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2017 at 9:13 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jul 13, 2017 at 9:06 | history | edited | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| S Jul 13, 2017 at 8:53 | history | answered | Ivan Di Liberti | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S Jul 13, 2017 at 8:53 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Ivan Di Liberti |