Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 17 at 7:12 comment added Dave Benson You might also be interested in Ed Brown's paper, "Generalizations of the Kervaire invariant", especially the discussion of quadratic forms in Section 3. It's not quite what you're asking, but it's related.
Jul 17 at 2:13 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Capitalise title, while this is on the front page
Jul 17 at 2:05 answer added Eric S. timeline score: 2
Jul 13, 2017 at 13:07 comment added user85913 @EhudMeir The reduction to the cyclic case is not at all obvious (to me). But Chapter 5 of Scharlau's book Quadratic and Hermitian Forms appears to be very relevant.
Jul 13, 2017 at 11:42 comment added Ehud Meir @t.c. I can see how to reduce to the case where $|A|$ is a prime power. However: how do we reduce the non-cyclic case to the cyclic case?
Jul 13, 2017 at 8:07 comment added user85913 @LSpice, I'm not sure whether calling the sum a ``quadratic Gauss sum'' agrees with standard usage when $|A|$ is not prime, but I think at least that the computation is still ok: if $A=\mathbb Z/n$, then $q$ has the form $q(a,b)=\exp(2\pi i abc /n)$ for some $c\in (\mathbb Z/n)^*$, and the sum is $\sum_{a\in \mathbb Z/n} \exp(2\pi i a^2 c/n)$, which I believe was computed by Gauss.
Jul 12, 2017 at 16:49 comment added LSpice @t.c., I think that further $\lvert A\rvert$ should be prime, no?
Jul 12, 2017 at 14:44 comment added user85913 If $A$ is cyclic then this is an example of a quadratic Gauss sum, which have been computed by Gauss.
Jul 12, 2017 at 13:45 history asked Ehud Meir CC BY-SA 3.0