Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 30, 2017 at 12:36 history edited Duchamp Gérard H. E. CC BY-SA 3.0
Completed the theorem and gave an application
Jul 27, 2017 at 21:04 history edited Duchamp Gérard H. E. CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed an error
Jul 16, 2017 at 16:32 comment added Duchamp Gérard H. E. @KonstantinosKanakoglou No this is OK.
Jul 16, 2017 at 16:04 comment added Konstantinos Kanakoglou Duchamp, I have added one more tag. I think it is relevant. If however you disagree, feel free to retag.
S Jul 16, 2017 at 16:02 history suggested Konstantinos Kanakoglou
one tag added
Jul 16, 2017 at 15:46 review Suggested edits
S Jul 16, 2017 at 16:02
Jul 10, 2017 at 5:00 vote accept Duchamp Gérard H. E.
Jul 9, 2017 at 19:00 answer added Konstantinos Kanakoglou timeline score: 6
Jul 9, 2017 at 17:03 comment added Duchamp Gérard H. E. @KonstantinosKanakoglou [ qualify for such a non-go theorem?]---> Yes of course, because I am in search of knowing the possibility (or not) of representations of together Heisenberg-Weyl generators and their exponentials.
Jul 9, 2017 at 16:47 comment added Konstantinos Kanakoglou In order to be more specific, are you mainly interested in representations of the "integrated" forms of the Heisenberg-Weyl generators (i.e. their exponentials) or are you more interested in the representations of the Weyl algebra itself?
Jul 9, 2017 at 16:43 comment added Konstantinos Kanakoglou Would the Stone-von Neumann uniqueness theorem or any other result guaranteeing the uiniqueness of the Fock representation -up to unitary equivalence- qualify for such a non-go theorem?
Jul 9, 2017 at 16:37 history edited Duchamp Gérard H. E. CC BY-SA 3.0
Spelling
Jul 9, 2017 at 14:28 history edited Duchamp Gérard H. E. CC BY-SA 3.0
Shortened title
Jul 9, 2017 at 14:21 history asked Duchamp Gérard H. E. CC BY-SA 3.0