Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

This is somewhat related to Greg's questionGreg's question about groups and abelian groups. Suppose you met someone who was well-acquainted with groups, but who was unwilling to accept rings as a meaningful object of study. How would you describe rings to them in a natural way given that they like talking about groups?

(Admittedly this is not really the question the title asks.)

This is somewhat related to Greg's question about groups and abelian groups. Suppose you met someone who was well-acquainted with groups, but who was unwilling to accept rings as a meaningful object of study. How would you describe rings to them in a natural way given that they like talking about groups?

(Admittedly this is not really the question the title asks.)

This is somewhat related to Greg's question about groups and abelian groups. Suppose you met someone who was well-acquainted with groups, but who was unwilling to accept rings as a meaningful object of study. How would you describe rings to them in a natural way given that they like talking about groups?

(Admittedly this is not really the question the title asks.)

Source Link
Qiaochu Yuan
  • 118.2k
  • 40
  • 447
  • 741

What is the "right" definition of a ring?

This is somewhat related to Greg's question about groups and abelian groups. Suppose you met someone who was well-acquainted with groups, but who was unwilling to accept rings as a meaningful object of study. How would you describe rings to them in a natural way given that they like talking about groups?

(Admittedly this is not really the question the title asks.)