Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 22, 2017 at 3:12 answer added Vladimir Dotsenko timeline score: 4
Jul 7, 2017 at 18:05 history edited Mare CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Jul 7, 2017 at 17:59 comment added darij grinberg Actually, maybe this helps: Guillermo Ames, Leandro Cagliero, Paulo Tirao, The GL-module structure of the Hochschild homology of truncated tensor algebras. The algebra they study is the same; but they study the homology, not the cohomology. But the projective resolution can't hurt...
Jul 7, 2017 at 17:57 comment added darij grinberg @Mare: Oops, I got the module wrong. Sorry, but can you please change the title to something more concrete than just "Hochschild cohomology" (this is a tag on 61 questions)?
Jul 7, 2017 at 17:43 history edited Mare CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Jul 7, 2017 at 16:36 comment added Victor Protsak You probably mean that $J$ is the ideal generated by $x_1,\dots,x_n$ (the span of these elemens is not an ideal).
Jul 7, 2017 at 15:13 comment added Mare I think the new title does not fit to the problem.
Jul 7, 2017 at 10:10 comment added darij grinberg Possibly related: Claude Cibils, Tensor Hochschild homology and cohomology.
Jul 7, 2017 at 10:09 history edited darij grinberg CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Jul 7, 2017 at 8:34 comment added Julian Kuelshammer For the commutative case, the Hochschild cohomology ring should be the polynomial ring in $n$ variables over $A$ for $m=2$ and for $m>2$ it should be the tenor product over $A$ of an exterior algebra in $n$ variables over $A$ and a polynomial ring in $n$ variables over $A$. For $n=\operatorname{char} K$ this is stated in "Hopf algebra structures and tensor products of group algebras" by Carlson and Iyengar.
S Jul 7, 2017 at 0:50 history suggested LSpice CC BY-SA 3.0
Brackets <> -> \langle\rangle, and light copy-editing
Jul 7, 2017 at 0:27 review Suggested edits
S Jul 7, 2017 at 0:50
Jul 6, 2017 at 23:44 history asked Mare CC BY-SA 3.0