Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 19, 2019 at 6:49 vote accept Alexander Chervov
Jun 17, 2019 at 15:47 answer added Geoff Robinson timeline score: 7
Jul 9, 2017 at 19:27 history edited Alexander Chervov CC BY-SA 3.0
added 114 characters in body
Jul 6, 2017 at 20:39 history edited Alexander Chervov CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Jul 6, 2017 at 20:32 history edited Alexander Chervov CC BY-SA 3.0
added 10 characters in body
Jul 6, 2017 at 20:25 history edited Alexander Chervov CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1624 characters in body
Jul 6, 2017 at 19:01 comment added Alexander Chervov @JesseSilliman can you extend your comment to an answer - even if it is not complete it would be quite useful.
Jul 6, 2017 at 16:05 comment added Jesse Silliman I can describe how the correspondence works for $GL_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$. One direction is given by restriction (and throwing away projective summands), the other by induction (and throwing away projective summands), I think that the irregular principal series have projective reductions mod p, so are not part of the Green Correspondence, while all the other irreducibles have, for some choice of integral structure, non-projective indecomposable reductions. I learned of the Green Correspondence from web.stanford.edu/~tonyfeng/mod_rep_theory.pdf
Jul 6, 2017 at 7:28 comment added Alexander Chervov @JesseSilliman thank you for your comment ! Can you give reference and more info on "Green Correspondence" ?
Jul 6, 2017 at 7:26 comment added Alexander Chervov @paulgarrett McKay predicts that characters of STANDARD torus gives both cuspidal and non. Can Weil&K rep be related to character of standard torus ?
Jul 6, 2017 at 0:06 comment added Jesse Silliman The Green Correspondence in modular representation theory might also be relevant: it says that there is a bijection between the non-projective indecomposable mod p representations of $GL_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$ and those of $B(\mathbb{F}_p)$.
Jul 5, 2017 at 22:17 comment added paul garrett For $SL_2(\mathbb F_q)$, the Segal-Shale-Weil/theta/Howe correspondence or pairing with the split $O(2)$ over $\mathbb F_q$ and also the non-split $O(2)$ do parametrize both (irreducible) principal series and cuspidal repns. Is this the sort of thing you'd be interested in?
Jul 5, 2017 at 19:51 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 3.0
improved formatting
Jul 5, 2017 at 19:37 history edited Alexander Chervov CC BY-SA 3.0
added 164 characters in body
Jul 5, 2017 at 19:29 history asked Alexander Chervov CC BY-SA 3.0