Timeline for Clarification on Hanamura's work on $t$ structure of triangulated category of mixed motives
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2017 at 13:01 | vote | accept | Wenzhe | ||
| Jul 1, 2017 at 6:05 | comment | added | Mikhail Bondarko | I would recommend you to contact either Leonid Positselski (positselski.narod.ru, positselski at yandex dot ru) or Sasha Beilinson. | |
| Jun 30, 2017 at 19:22 | comment | added | Mikhail Bondarko | It's easy to believe that certain conjectures on the "motivic Hopf algebra" imply the statement you are interested in. Yet I doubt that anybody has written this down carefully. | |
| Jun 30, 2017 at 15:15 | comment | added | Wenzhe | Thank you very much. Ayoub's in his paper a guide to (etale) motivic sheaves gives an ambiguous remark 5.8, i.e. conjecture A and conjecture B, in his paper "L'algebre de Hopf et le groupe de Galois motiviques d'un corps de caracteristique nulle, I." should imply the t structure conjecture of $\textbf{DA}^{et}_{ct}(S,\Lambda)$ andmore, "by more, we have in mind the property that $\textbf{DA}^{et}_{ct}(S,\Lambda)$ is equivalent to the derived category of the heart of its motivic t-structure ". Do you know whether this "more" has been proved or not? | |
| Jun 30, 2017 at 14:34 | history | answered | Mikhail Bondarko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |