Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 3, 2019 at 20:26 history edited T. Amdeberhan CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1008 characters in body
Jun 24, 2017 at 22:24 comment added efs Of course. I should read more carefully the other answers before posting. Thanks for the response. (I was entertaining myself with this determinant in Mathematica while finishing some pending bureaucratic work in the computer.)
Jun 24, 2017 at 21:23 history edited T. Amdeberhan CC BY-SA 3.0
added 226 characters in body
Jun 24, 2017 at 19:08 comment added GH from MO Your first line should be corrected as $\det\Phi=\prod_{0\leq i<j < d} (\xi^j-\xi^i)$. Also, Zach Teitler is right: distinguishing between $\pm i$ is subtle here, and it is pretty much the same problem as evaluating the Gauss sum precisely (not only up to $\pm$ sign which is an easier task). The point is that $(\det\Phi)^2$ has two square-roots, and you need to pin down which one is $\det\Phi$.
Jun 24, 2017 at 17:55 comment added Zach Teitler You say $\det \Phi = (-1)^{\binom{d}{2}} \left( d^d (-1)^{\binom{d-1}{2}} \right)^{1/2} = (-1)^{\binom{d}{2}} d^{\frac{d}{2}} i^{\binom{d-1}{2}}$. Is it obvious that we get $i$ instead of $-i$ at the end? Or do we need something like the accepted answer's argument (pun intended)?
Jun 24, 2017 at 16:27 history answered T. Amdeberhan CC BY-SA 3.0