Timeline for Do the Lebesgue-null sets cover "all the sets can naturally be regarded as sort-of-null sets"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2017 at 15:08 | comment | added | Julian Newman | I've edited the title as suggested. (I guess I had to edit the title rather than the question, since a negative answer has already been given.) | |
| Jun 20, 2017 at 15:05 | history | edited | Julian Newman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Change title as suggested
|
| Jun 20, 2017 at 15:03 | vote | accept | Julian Newman | ||
| Jun 20, 2017 at 13:23 | comment | added | jonathanverner | Regarding the conversely part, you will have trouble proving countable additivity of the resulting notion of "sort-of-null" sets. See also this question. | |
| Jun 20, 2017 at 11:58 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Your title question is the opposite of the question asked in the post. I'd recommend an edit to change one of them or the other, in order to avoid confusion. | |
| Jun 20, 2017 at 11:51 | answer | added | Joel David Hamkins | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jun 20, 2017 at 9:00 | history | asked | Julian Newman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |