Timeline for Equivariant Riemann-Hurwitz
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 at 13:28 | comment | added | Bruno Kahn | The wild action case (for l-adic homology) is also due to Weil: see Serre, Corps locaux, ch. VI, §4, prop. 7. | |
| Jun 21, 2017 at 7:30 | comment | added | Niels | You may wonder why Chevalley and Weil, both French, wrote in German. The reason is that they were answering a letter from Hecke (here you can see why modular curves are at the origin of this question). | |
| Jun 21, 2017 at 7:28 | comment | added | Niels | It is more a question for an historian. If you are fluent in German, you can find Chevalley-Weil's article here : doi.org/10.1007/BF02940687 | |
| Jun 20, 2017 at 23:00 | comment | added | Ben Wieland | Chevalley and Weil didn't have holomorphic Lefschetz, did they? What did they do? | |
| Jun 20, 2017 at 14:18 | vote | accept | Ben Wieland | ||
| Jun 18, 2017 at 21:23 | history | edited | Niels | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jun 18, 2017 at 20:54 | history | answered | Niels | CC BY-SA 3.0 |