Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 19, 2017 at 1:00 answer added Suvrit timeline score: 3
Jun 18, 2017 at 19:20 answer added GH from MO timeline score: 10
Jun 18, 2017 at 19:15 vote accept T. Amdeberhan
Jun 18, 2017 at 19:14 comment added GH from MO @Lewi_Sol: I think the identities recorded in these papers are not obscure but very general.
Jun 18, 2017 at 19:12 comment added Lewi_Sol You may be right, but it seems obscure to me.
Jun 18, 2017 at 19:08 comment added GH from MO @Lewi_Sol: See Theorem 4.2 in Hoffman's paper and Theorem 3.8 in Kawashima's paper. I am lazy to check all the details (how the identity in Question 2 follows from these).
Jun 18, 2017 at 19:06 comment added Lewi_Sol Can you give reference pages?
Jun 18, 2017 at 19:04 comment added GH from MO Regarding Question 2, I am quite certain the identity is a special case of an identity of Hoffman and Kawashima. See arxiv.org/abs/math/0702824 and arxiv.org/abs/math/0401319
Jun 18, 2017 at 18:57 comment added François Brunault This infinite sum can be expressed in terms of multiple zeta values. In the case $m=2$ we have $\sum_{n \geq 1} H_2(n)/n^2 = \zeta(2,1,1)+\zeta(3,1)+\zeta(4)+\zeta(2,2) = \zeta(4)+(1/4)\zeta(4)+\zeta(4)+(3/4)\zeta(4)=3\zeta(4)$ as you predicted (these relations date back essentially to Euler).
Jun 18, 2017 at 18:42 history edited T. Amdeberhan CC BY-SA 3.0
added 135 characters in body
Jun 18, 2017 at 18:30 history edited T. Amdeberhan CC BY-SA 3.0
added 105 characters in body
Jun 18, 2017 at 18:30 answer added Lucia timeline score: 21
Jun 18, 2017 at 18:29 comment added Sylvain JULIEN If true, it would be a really beautiful formula.
Jun 18, 2017 at 18:28 comment added T. Amdeberhan Quite extensively.
Jun 18, 2017 at 18:23 comment added ARG how far did you check it numerically?
Jun 18, 2017 at 17:40 history asked T. Amdeberhan CC BY-SA 3.0