Timeline for Choosing canonical representatives of Weyl group elements, some questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 21, 2017 at 0:06 | vote | accept | D_S | ||
Jun 18, 2017 at 13:01 | comment | added | Mikhail Borovoi | (2) $X_\alpha$ is a nilpotent matrix, so in char. 0 $\exp X_\alpha$ is defined. (3) You have $H_\alpha$, then you choose $X_\alpha$ and get $X_{-\alpha}$ such that $[X_\alpha,X_{-\alpha}]=H_\alpha$. This triple $(X_\alpha, H_\alpha,X_{-\alpha})$ defines an embedding ${\rm Lie\,SL}(2)\to {\rm Lie}\,G$, which is the differential of some homomorphism ${\rm SL}(2) \to G$. This homomorphism is what you need. | |
Jun 17, 2017 at 16:49 | history | edited | D_S |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 17, 2017 at 15:56 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 17, 2017 at 3:12 | comment | added | LSpice | (1) $H_\alpha$ as an element of $\mathfrak t$ is $\mathrm dH_\alpha(1)$ in your sense. (2) Yes, precisely; it uses an identification of the root subspace with the root subgroup. This is canonical only up to conjugation by $T$. (3) This is the homomorphism coming from the theory of Jacobson–Morosov triples. It too is canonical only up to conjugation by something or other. | |
Jun 17, 2017 at 2:36 | history | asked | D_S | CC BY-SA 3.0 |