Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16, 2017 at 23:13 comment added John Klein @MikeMiller I don't have complete argument, but here's an idea: the total space is of the form $(S^4 \vee S^5) \cup_f D^9$. The attaching map $f: S^8 \to S^4 \vee S^5$ has 3 components: $\pi_8(S^4) + \pi_8(S^5) + \pi_8(S^8)$ where the second component is trivial because the bundle has a section. It's enough to show that the first component is non-trivial after suspending once into $\pi_9(S^5) \cong \Bbb Z/2$. I suspect that the unstable $J$-homomorphism $\pi_4(SO(5)) \to \pi_9(S^5)$ is an isomorphism. If true, the result follows as the tangent bundle of $S^5$ is non-trivial.
Jun 16, 2017 at 22:56 answer added mme timeline score: 3
Jun 16, 2017 at 22:30 answer added PVAL timeline score: 3
Jun 16, 2017 at 22:01 history edited YCor
edited tags
Jun 16, 2017 at 21:57 comment added mme @JohnKlein Do you know a proof that $T^1 S^5$ is not homotopy equivalent to $S^4 \times S^5$? I'd like to try to use whatever invariant distinguishes these as an obstruction somehow.
Jun 16, 2017 at 21:56 comment added mme @YCor Right, though now you probably want to phrase intersection numbers / the rest of the argument in terms of compactly supported cohomology.
Jun 16, 2017 at 21:53 comment added YCor @MikeMiller I guess this argument works with "homeomorphic"?
S Jun 16, 2017 at 21:36 history edited Qfwfq CC BY-SA 3.0
grammar and a typo
S Jun 16, 2017 at 21:36 history suggested étale-cohomology CC BY-SA 3.0
grammar and a typo
Jun 16, 2017 at 21:25 review Suggested edits
S Jun 16, 2017 at 21:36
Jun 16, 2017 at 21:14 comment added John Klein @MikeMiller Right!
Jun 16, 2017 at 21:10 comment added mme @JohnKlein It's simpler than that; such a sphere in $\Bbb R^{2n}$ would have nontrivial self-intersection. It's not possible for any even $n$.
Jun 16, 2017 at 21:05 comment added John Klein It's definitely not true in the case $n=2$. The unit tangent sphere bundle in this case has total space $SO(3) \cong \Bbb RP^3$, and it is well-known that $\Bbb RP^3$ doesn't embed in $\Bbb R^4$.
Jun 16, 2017 at 20:50 history asked Ali Taghavi CC BY-SA 3.0