Timeline for Covering the plane with line segments with local hexagonal constraints
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2017 at 19:04 | answer | added | user111233 | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 16, 2017 at 5:28 | history | edited | PaulC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 59 characters in body
|
Jun 16, 2017 at 5:06 | history | edited | PaulC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I have been implicitly assuming no dead ends, and I added that as a constraint.
|
Jun 16, 2017 at 1:42 | history | edited | PaulC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 588 characters in body
|
Jun 15, 2017 at 15:36 | history | edited | PaulC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changes "paths" to channels
|
Jun 15, 2017 at 15:35 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | Instead of "paths," maybe: channels. | |
Jun 15, 2017 at 15:34 | history | edited | PaulC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 634 characters in body
|
Jun 15, 2017 at 15:27 | comment | added | PaulC | I agree. That is why I put "paths" in scare quotes. Can you suggest something more clear? This constraint can even be omitted, though it came up in a different tiling problem that this one generalizes and I wanted to preserve it. | |
Jun 15, 2017 at 15:18 | comment | added | Jim Conant | Calling the stuff in between the line segments a "path" is confusing, since path is often a synonym for line segment. It was only when I saw your illustration of point 3 that I saw what you meant. | |
Jun 15, 2017 at 14:48 | history | edited | PaulC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed stray line from figure. Removed unnecessary brackets.
|
Jun 15, 2017 at 14:42 | history | edited | PaulC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
Jun 15, 2017 at 14:35 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | (I included your images.) | |
Jun 15, 2017 at 14:34 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Included images; changed tag.
|
Jun 15, 2017 at 14:30 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 15, 2017 at 14:39 | |||||
Jun 15, 2017 at 14:28 | history | asked | PaulC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |