Timeline for How to conclude good reduction from $\mathcal{P} \nmid m$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2017 at 13:48 | vote | accept | anama | ||
| Jun 13, 2017 at 12:29 | comment | added | Chris Wuthrich | To be certain that the $m$-torsion injects as in VII.3.1 in Silverman1, otherwise there could be $m$-torsion in the formal group. | |
| Jun 13, 2017 at 9:48 | comment | added | anama | Thanks for your answer. Your argument that this prime is chosen so by its property iv convince me, because I thougt so too. But what for we use then the fifth property which is that $\mathcal{P}$ does not divide $m$? | |
| Jun 13, 2017 at 9:25 | history | answered | Chris Wuthrich | CC BY-SA 3.0 |