Timeline for Tutte's conjecture on Petersen graphs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2022 at 16:47 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | @GordonRoyle I think there is some confusion here between (on the one hand) the full 4-flow conjecture, and (on the other hand) the special case of the 4-flow conjecture for cubic graphs. The full 4-flow conjecture is certainly still open. The special case of cubic graphs, which is what the OP asked about, is widely considered to have been settled by RSST, even though the details have apparently not yet appeared. | |
| Jun 21, 2017 at 8:25 | history | edited | Shahrooz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
New material added
|
| Jun 18, 2017 at 12:19 | comment | added | Shahrooz | It seems that we have a paradoxical evidences. Maybe you can ask the original authors for clarifying. | |
| Jun 18, 2017 at 4:30 | comment | added | Gordon Royle | So the conjecture is proved and also is not proved? | |
| Jun 13, 2017 at 9:08 | history | edited | Shahrooz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added new evidence
|
| S Jun 13, 2017 at 8:44 | history | suggested | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added Google Books link; the post has been bumped anyway
|
| Jun 13, 2017 at 8:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 13, 2017 at 8:44 | |||||
| Jun 13, 2017 at 8:13 | history | edited | Dima Pasechnik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
English
|
| Jun 13, 2017 at 6:36 | history | edited | Shahrooz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I added a link
|
| Jun 13, 2017 at 6:18 | history | answered | Shahrooz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |