Timeline for A Lagrangian connection and its algebraic interpretation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jun 13, 2017 at 19:46 | vote | accept | Ali Taghavi | ||
| Jun 13, 2017 at 8:24 | answer | added | Robert Bryant | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jun 13, 2017 at 5:54 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @alvarezpaiva my apology if my question is elementary. But I do not underestand why the LC conection is automatically Lagrangian. Moreover what is the algebraic formulation of the lagrangian property for the distribution associated with the derivative $\nabla$? | |
| Jun 13, 2017 at 5:47 | history | undeleted | Ali Taghavi | ||
| Jun 12, 2017 at 21:56 | history | deleted | Ali Taghavi | via Vote | |
| Jun 12, 2017 at 20:47 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @alvarezpaiva thank you for your comment. What is the reason that the LC connection is lagrangian?what is an algebraic criterion to determine whether a connection $\nabla$ is Lagrangian? | |
| Jun 12, 2017 at 20:41 | comment | added | alvarezpaiva | Maybe I'm not understanding your definition, but it seems to me the Levi-Civita connection of any metric Lagrangian. So is the Ehresmann connection associated to any Finsler metric/ | |
| Jun 12, 2017 at 20:35 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Jun 12, 2017 at 20:27 | history | asked | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |