Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 1, 2017 at 10:55 history bounty ended Joseph Van Name
Jul 3, 2017 at 21:25 comment added Douglas Zare I don't think intrinsic value contradicts random generation. Randomly generate a sequence for a protein, then see if the most efficient configurations fit some receptors (or more concretely, you can imagine that afterward, the result can be translated as $0.05\%$ likely to cure cancer, $97.3\%$ likely to kill the patient). It may be of interest to search a very large space for proteins which have desirable properties. You can imagine that the problem is to compute properties of random algebraic curves. The collected data would show the distributions of genera or other statistics.
Jun 5, 2017 at 3:53 comment added domotorp Well, that's exactly what I wrote in my first answer as well... Then in my second answer I've tried to overcome this difficulty.
Jun 5, 2017 at 1:14 comment added John Tromp I believe the requirement to be contradictory. One cannot hope for intrinsic value in solutions to randomly generated proof-of-work problems; only for value in the development of most efficient methods for solving them.
Jun 4, 2017 at 19:00 comment added domotorp Quoting Yoav: "Intrinsic value: The solution to the problems must have some intrinsic value. These solutions and not just the process of obtaining the solutions should be of a scientific, mathematical or practical interest."
Jun 4, 2017 at 17:00 vote accept Joseph Van Name
Jun 8, 2017 at 4:22
Jun 4, 2017 at 16:33 history bounty ended Joseph Van Name
Jun 4, 2017 at 14:39 history edited John Tromp CC BY-SA 3.0
added 110 characters in body
Jun 4, 2017 at 14:36 review First posts
Jun 4, 2017 at 14:44
Jun 4, 2017 at 14:34 history answered John Tromp CC BY-SA 3.0