Timeline for Distribution of $0$-$1$ matrices
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 20:54 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | Standard usage is \det M rather than {\rm det}\,M. If you write a\det b or a\det(b) you see $a\det b$ or $a\det(b)$ respectively, and I include both examples so that you can see the context-dependent nature of the spacing. | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 20:52 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 16:13 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | The poster is talking about binary matrices, with entries from 0,1. There is a transformation that carries them to matrices with 1,-1, some of which are Hadamard. Also, I would say much is unknown, and that Orrick's talk is close to state of the art at present. Gerhard "Prefers The Phrase 'Binary Matrices'" Paseman, 2017.06.02. | |
| Jun 2, 2017 at 14:00 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 88 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 14:00 | vote | accept | Lewi_Sol | ||
| Jun 2, 2017 at 13:57 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 88 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 13:51 | history | answered | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |