Timeline for Do intermediate spaces imply the information about interpolation spaces couple?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 31, 2017 at 9:55 | history | edited | Ice sea | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
May 31, 2017 at 9:46 | answer | added | Hannes | timeline score: 4 | |
May 31, 2017 at 6:37 | comment | added | Ice sea | @WillieWong I have edited my question. It should be clear now. | |
May 31, 2017 at 6:37 | history | edited | Ice sea | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
May 31, 2017 at 6:31 | history | edited | Ice sea | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
May 30, 2017 at 21:09 | comment | added | Willie Wong | For clarification: what do you intend with the symbol $\Subset$? For the actual question, you seem to assume a symmetric statement $(Z,X)_* = (Z,Y)_*$ and conclude an asymmetric one $X \Subset Y$. Is that intended? Finally, what if you take $X, Y, Z$ to be Lorentz spaces? Does that tell you something about what you want to know? | |
May 30, 2017 at 17:20 | comment | added | Ice sea | @MichaelRenardy Thank you. Yes, I were careless | |
May 30, 2017 at 17:18 | comment | added | Michael Renardy | I assume you meant "intermediate," not "immediate." | |
May 30, 2017 at 17:17 | history | edited | Michael Renardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected title
|
May 30, 2017 at 16:30 | history | asked | Ice sea | CC BY-SA 3.0 |