Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 28, 2017 at 19:26 comment added Mikhail Bondarko If the codimension of $X$ in $\mathbb{CP}^n$ is "small" (less than $n/3$) then the lower cohomology of $X$ is isomorphic to that of $\mathbb{CP}^n$ (by Barth's theorem); hence there is a simlar statement for its higher cohomology (given by duality). However, I don't know whether a result that tells nothing about the "middle" cohomology is interesting to you.
May 27, 2017 at 6:09 vote accept dhy
May 26, 2017 at 16:06 comment added Jason Starr I believe their method gives a bound on the Betti numbers for any projective manifold $X^n\subset \mathbb{P}^N$ in terms of $N$, $n$, and the least degree $d$ such that for the ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I}$, $\mathcal{I}(d)$ is globally generated. The bound should be a polynomial in $d$ whose degree is a linear function of $N$ and $n$.
May 26, 2017 at 15:25 comment added dhy @JasonStarr Does the Milnor-Thom approach provide a bound for any subvariety? I was under the impression that their theorem only covered the cases of hypersurfaces.
May 26, 2017 at 13:32 comment added Jason Starr There is a bound on the sum of the Betti numbers due to Thom and Milnor.
May 26, 2017 at 12:26 comment added Libli might be the case
May 26, 2017 at 12:20 comment added dhy @Libli: The issue is that the Hilbert scheme may become highly disconnected when one removes points corresponding to singular varieties - I admittedly don't have an example of the top of my head, but I would be extremely surprised if one did not exist.
May 26, 2017 at 11:39 comment added Libli By the way, a result of Hartschorne says that the Hilbert scheme of subschemes of projective space is connected (see : numdam.org/article/PMIHES_1966__29__5_0.pdf). So, if I am not mistaken, the total Betti number should not vary too much along the Hibert scheme...
May 26, 2017 at 11:07 answer added Libli timeline score: 17
May 26, 2017 at 10:26 history asked dhy CC BY-SA 3.0