Timeline for Finiteness properties of mapping class groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2017 at 14:12 | comment | added | Misha | @MehdiYazdi: Its complicated, see for instance "A Short course in geometric group theory" by Walter Neumann. Roughly speaking, you are looking for a regular geodesic language on your group (for some generating set). | |
| May 26, 2017 at 1:15 | comment | added | Mehdi Yazdi | Could you explain what is the relation between 'being automatic' and 'having finitely many cone types'? Does the former imply the later? Under what conditions the former implies the later? | |
| May 25, 2017 at 23:01 | comment | added | Misha | Igor: What Mosher proves is the existence of an automatic structure. He does not prove existence of a finite presentation which has a geodesic combing (satisfying falsification by fellow traveler property). | |
| May 25, 2017 at 22:34 | history | answered | Igor Rivin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |