Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 27, 2021 at 18:46 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Stefan Kohl
May 23, 2017 at 23:51 comment added Denis Nardin @darijgrinberg The $\lambda$-structure of $K_*(X)$ is kind of important (e.g. rationally the splitting of $K_*(X)$ in eigenspaces for the Adams operations is precisely the splitting in rational motivic cohomology groups) but not really "central", in the sense that you can develop large swaths of the theory without mentioning it (although it will probably lurk in the backgroud).
May 23, 2017 at 20:55 answer added Will Sawin timeline score: 46
May 23, 2017 at 20:15 answer added Tom Copeland timeline score: 12
May 23, 2017 at 18:29 comment added darij grinberg $K_0$ of a ring is a $\lambda$-ring, and of course the free $\lambda$-ring on one generator is the ring of symmetric functions... so K-theory in some sense has its origins in the symmetric functions. Though I don't know how much of this sticks around in the higher $K_i$'s.
May 23, 2017 at 18:17 comment added Todd Trimble @René Touché! Of course you're right. :-)
May 23, 2017 at 16:21 answer added Vladimir Dotsenko timeline score: 7
May 23, 2017 at 16:02 answer added Abdelmalek Abdesselam timeline score: 18
May 23, 2017 at 15:51 comment added Liviu Nicolaescu This MO post might be relevant mathoverflow.net/questions/66075/…
May 23, 2017 at 15:45 comment added R.P. @ToddTrimble: Isn't that what diatribes are for? :-)
May 23, 2017 at 15:28 comment added Todd Trimble There's also a dearth of real scholarly evidence in many of his diatribes/rants.
May 23, 2017 at 14:59 comment added Sam Hopkins A hint to decoding Rota: Rota said a lot of intentionally provocative things.
May 23, 2017 at 14:55 answer added Joël timeline score: 24
May 23, 2017 at 14:46 review First posts
May 23, 2017 at 14:51
May 23, 2017 at 14:40 history asked William Stagner CC BY-SA 3.0