Timeline for Why are Green functions involved in intersection theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2019 at 11:52 | comment | added | Dubious | Just read your reply. I'll contact you very soon | |
| Jun 4, 2019 at 3:53 | comment | added | Bombyx mori | @Dubious: Hi! I had been waiting for your email, but did not get anything. If you have something to talk about, do let me know. | |
| Jun 2, 2019 at 12:17 | comment | added | Dubious | Dear @bombyx mori, I would like, if possible, to exchange a few messages with you in private. Can we find a way to talk? | |
| May 29, 2017 at 7:44 | comment | added | Bombyx mori | Here is a link: publications.ias.edu/sites/default/files/Number58.pdf | |
| May 29, 2017 at 7:40 | comment | added | Bombyx mori | @Dubious: Here is a more precise reference I discovered while reading Bost. I think the first serious use of non-admissible Green functions (or currents) is due to Deligine, and then it has been used by Bost as well as many others. The first reference I know is "Le déterminant de la cohomologie". But this is a very long text, so not sure if it will be useful. | |
| May 21, 2017 at 1:08 | comment | added | Bombyx mori | @Dubious: I see. Here is a translation of Arakelov's original paper: iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1070/IM1974v008n06ABEH002141/pdf. Hope it helps. I was working on a translation on my own and in the midway I discovered this. | |
| May 20, 2017 at 19:03 | history | edited | Bombyx mori | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed some typo
|
| May 20, 2017 at 18:11 | comment | added | Dubious | unfortunately I can't, because I have other things to do. By the way I'd be very happy to talk with you about Arakelov geometry in the future. | |
| May 20, 2017 at 17:21 | comment | added | Bombyx mori | @Dubious: By the way, are you going to the summer school in Grenoble? I am not sure how many people will be there. I feel very excited. | |
| May 20, 2017 at 17:17 | comment | added | Bombyx mori | @Dubious: I think nowadays they are abundant in literature. Some search on arxiv should give you plenty of results. | |
| May 20, 2017 at 8:50 | comment | added | Dubious | Beautiful answer! Can you give some references about the Arakelov intersection pairing without the admissibility condition? It seems a very interesting topic. | |
| May 20, 2017 at 7:33 | history | answered | Bombyx mori | CC BY-SA 3.0 |