Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 18, 2017 at 20:27 vote accept Nati
May 17, 2017 at 17:13 answer added YHBKJ timeline score: 5
May 17, 2017 at 12:55 comment added Tony Pantev A silly comment - since $X$ is a symplectic specialization of $Z$, $\check{X}$ should be complex specialization of $\check{Z}$. So you will need to understand how to extract a semi-orthogonal decomposition of the Fukaya-Seidel category from a specialization family. For example, the mirror of a del Pezzo $dP_{n}$ is a rational elliptic surface with an $I_{9-n}$ fiber at infinity. The blow-up of $dP_{n}$ at a point corresponds to morsifying one node of the fiber at infinity, i.e. to a splitting it as $I_{1}+I_{9-(n+1)}$ and morsification gives you a semi-orthogonal decomposition of FS.
May 16, 2017 at 22:00 history edited Nati CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 111 characters in body
May 16, 2017 at 21:50 history edited Nati CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 111 characters in body
May 16, 2017 at 21:49 comment added user21574 Bertie right. In fact if $\pi: \tilde X\to X$ be birational blow up then $K_{\tilde X}=\pi^*(K_X)+E$, so if $c_1(X)=0$ then $c_1(\tilde X)=E$ which is not CY
May 16, 2017 at 21:45 comment added Bertie A minor comment, but since Kodaira dimension is a birational invariant, your $Z$ will never be either Fano or general type; since the canonical bundle is nontrivial, it will not be CY either.
May 16, 2017 at 21:40 history edited Nati CC BY-SA 3.0
added 138 characters in body
May 16, 2017 at 21:31 history asked Nati CC BY-SA 3.0