Timeline for Perturbation of a rank-restricted product of matrices
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2017 at 11:11 | comment | added | Serghei | @ChristianRemling, thank you, it does seem more coherent. | |
| May 9, 2017 at 0:54 | comment | added | Noah Stein | It's not identical, but see mathoverflow.net/questions/264606/… | |
| May 8, 2017 at 22:03 | history | edited | Christian Remling | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 113 characters in body
|
| May 8, 2017 at 13:47 | comment | added | Serghei | @ChristianRemling, I do agree that the original statement could have been formulated for just two factors. However, I meant "how should a formulate what a perturbation means". | |
| May 7, 2017 at 18:26 | comment | added | Serghei | @FedorPetrov, I'm sorry for a possible confusion. Dr. Remling is correct, I would like all $\tilde{W}_j$ to be "close" to $W_j$. What would be the correct way to state this? | |
| May 7, 2017 at 14:29 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | The definition of perturbation is not clear at all (unless you use non-standard matrices, but I guess that you do not.) | |
| May 7, 2017 at 14:11 | review | First posts | |||
| May 7, 2017 at 15:48 | |||||
| May 7, 2017 at 14:06 | history | asked | Serghei | CC BY-SA 3.0 |