Timeline for Paper by Moser on commuting circle diffeomorphisms and simultaneous Diophantine approximations
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S May 4, 2017 at 20:05 | history | suggested | Hua Ying | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Since I manage to partially answer the question, I have to make some corrections in the question.
|
May 4, 2017 at 19:34 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 4, 2017 at 20:05 | |||||
S Apr 30, 2017 at 21:19 | history | suggested | Hua Ying | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
A suggestion improved.
|
Apr 30, 2017 at 21:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 30, 2017 at 21:19 | |||||
Apr 30, 2017 at 20:45 | history | edited | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
S Apr 30, 2017 at 11:31 | history | suggested | Hua Ying | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I fill in some missing details so the newcomers can at least understand the statment of the main theorem.
|
Apr 30, 2017 at 10:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 30, 2017 at 11:31 | |||||
Apr 30, 2017 at 9:56 | comment | added | Hua Ying | @AnthonyQuas OK, you are right. Here is what is confusing me. I am not sure why the identity $AA^*+B^*B=A^*A \otimes Id_{V_1}$ implies $Av-g=B^*BM^{-1}g$, where $v \in V_0$ is an approximate solution of $Av=g$, for $g \in V_1$, given by $v=A^*M^{-1}g$. Can someone help me with that? Thanks. | |
Apr 28, 2017 at 22:52 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | Welcome to MO Boris. I don't think this is a very good question for this web site. You're basically asking someone to digest a paper for you. This might be fair game for a very well known paper, but not for this one. Rather, a reasonable question would be something more specific. | |
Apr 28, 2017 at 17:36 | review | First posts | |||
Apr 28, 2017 at 17:38 | |||||
Apr 28, 2017 at 17:34 | history | asked | Boris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |