Timeline for Zeros of polynomials as a finite union of manifolds
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 28, 2017 at 10:03 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Apr 28, 2017 at 9:55 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 461 characters in body
|
Apr 28, 2017 at 9:50 | comment | added | Francesco Polizzi | Whitney stratification still exist in the complex setting. See my edit to the answer. | |
Apr 28, 2017 at 9:49 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 461 characters in body
|
Apr 28, 2017 at 9:34 | comment | added | user237522 | Please, what happens if we replace $\mathbb{R}$ by $\mathbb{C}$? | |
Apr 27, 2017 at 18:32 | comment | added | Francesco Polizzi | @Libli: you are right. This does not define in general a Whitney stratification, but some refinement will, see J. L. Verdier, Stratifications de Whitney et theoreme de Bertini-Sard, Invent. Math. 36 (1976), 295-312. Thank you for the remark. | |
Apr 27, 2017 at 18:16 | comment | added | Libli | Note however that the wikipedia reference that you provide contains a big mistake. If $X$ is a singular variety, the collection $Sing(X), Sing(Sing(X)),...$ is not a Whitney stratification in general. | |
Apr 27, 2017 at 17:14 | vote | accept | Arturo | ||
Apr 27, 2017 at 15:14 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
Apr 27, 2017 at 14:26 | history | answered | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |