Skip to main content
deleted 79 characters in body
Source Link
Colin
  • 171
  • 7

In Top, the monos are the injective maps and the regular monos are the subspace inclusions. Is there a (similarly pithy) categorical description for the open subspace inclusions?

(Such maps are classified by maps into the Sierpinski space. (See comments.))

In Top, the monos are the injective maps and the regular monos are the subspace inclusions. Is there a (similarly pithy) categorical description for the open subspace inclusions?

(Such maps are classified by maps into the Sierpinski space. (See comments.))

In Top, the monos are the injective maps and the regular monos are the subspace inclusions. Is there a (similarly pithy) categorical description for the open subspace inclusions?

added 83 characters in body
Source Link
Colin
  • 171
  • 7

In Top, the monos are the injective maps and the regular monos are the subspace inclusions. Is there a (similarly pithy) categorical description for the open subspace inclusions?

(Such maps are classified by maps into the Sierpinski space. (See comments.))

In Top, the monos are the injective maps and the regular monos are the subspace inclusions. Is there a (similarly pithy) categorical description for the open subspace inclusions?

In Top, the monos are the injective maps and the regular monos are the subspace inclusions. Is there a (similarly pithy) categorical description for the open subspace inclusions?

(Such maps are classified by maps into the Sierpinski space. (See comments.))

added 16 characters in body
Source Link
Colin
  • 171
  • 7

In Top, the monos are the injective maps and the regular monos are the subspace inclusions. Is there a (similarly pithy) categorical description for the open subspace inclusions?

In Top, the monos are the injective maps and the regular monos are the subspace inclusions. Is there a categorical description for the open subspace inclusions?

In Top, the monos are the injective maps and the regular monos are the subspace inclusions. Is there a (similarly pithy) categorical description for the open subspace inclusions?

Source Link
Colin
  • 171
  • 7
Loading