Timeline for Smoothing of a Kähler orbifold metric on a complex surface
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2017 at 20:27 | comment | added | aglearner | I deleted my previous comment (since it was a bit aggressive) but I still think that in this answer you don't really address my question but write something (that I can not really understand) on an adjacent topic. | |
| Apr 26, 2017 at 1:56 | vote | accept | aglearner | ||
| Apr 26, 2017 at 1:56 | |||||
| Apr 26, 2017 at 1:52 | history | edited | user21574 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 98 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2017 at 1:50 | comment | added | user21574 | You may see Lemma1 of arxiv.org/pdf/1209.2198.pdf | |
| Apr 26, 2017 at 0:39 | history | edited | user21574 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 148 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2017 at 0:34 | comment | added | user21574 | $\omega_\epsilon$ is Kahler metric in adiabatic classes, I added a reference. It is known fact due to Tian-Yau | |
| Apr 26, 2017 at 0:32 | history | edited | user21574 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 148 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2017 at 0:22 | comment | added | aglearner | Also you don't say what is $\omega_0$, you don't say what is $\theta_E$, etc... | |
| Apr 26, 2017 at 0:20 | comment | added | aglearner | Hassan, $S$ is a smooth complex surface, it has no singularities. Could you please change your answer accordingly? In the line three of your text you write without justification, that $\omega_{\epsilon}$ is Kaher. This does not make sense to me | |
| Apr 26, 2017 at 0:12 | history | edited | user21574 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 26, 2017 at 0:07 | history | edited | user21574 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1138 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2017 at 0:05 | history | undeleted | user21574 | ||
| Apr 25, 2017 at 17:53 | history | deleted | user21574 | via Vote | |
| Apr 25, 2017 at 17:50 | history | answered | user21574 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |