Timeline for Symmetrizing with respect to Galois Group: Trace and Norm
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 17, 2017 at 9:54 | answer | added | Doris | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 25, 2017 at 3:20 | history | edited | Myshkin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
+ top level tag (nt.)
|
Apr 25, 2017 at 2:50 | comment | added | Tom Goodwillie | But you can think of another generator of the cyclotomic field such that its trace is rational. For example, in the $8$th cyclotomic field $\zeta+\zeta^2+\zeta^3$. | |
Apr 25, 2017 at 2:37 | comment | added | P Vanchinathan | Thats my point: Using N, Tr, for relative norm and trace: $N(\zeta)$ and $N(1+\zeta)$ have different degrees as algebraic numbers. But Tr($\zeta$) and Tr($1+\zeta$) have same degrees. | |
Apr 25, 2017 at 0:51 | comment | added | Tom Goodwillie | There is no real asymmetry. It just happens that $\zeta\bar\zeta$ is rational. But use $\alpha=1+\zeta$ instead and you get $\alpha\bar\alpha=2+\zeta+\bar\zeta$. | |
Apr 25, 2017 at 0:35 | history | asked | P Vanchinathan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |