Skip to main content

Timeline for Anti-large cardinal principles

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 19, 2017 at 18:31 comment added Zetapology @NeilBarton Wouldn't it make more sense to look at principles which imply the inconsistency of small large cardinals? This is because these principles actually act like the large cardinals themselves; the weaker the large cardinal axiom is that these principles deny, the closer the principles are to inconsistency with ZFC (viewing ZFC itself as the weakest large cardinal axiom). Just a preference though, not necessary of course.
Apr 26, 2017 at 17:54 comment added Neil Barton In fact, if we look at the space below the axiom of infinity, the principle ``superexponentiation is not total'' (equivalent to the negation of the Finite Ramsey Theorem over $EFA$) would be a similar principle. In general assertions about fast growing functions behave a bit like large cardinals in the arithmetic realm (Peter Koellner made this point to me, and there's some similar remarks in his SEP article: plato.stanford.edu/entries/large-cardinals-determinacy).
Apr 26, 2017 at 17:50 comment added Neil Barton @OscarCunningham. Indeed. I regard that as an example of 3 (after all, the axiom of infinity seems like a large cardinal axiom to me).
Apr 26, 2017 at 17:20 comment added Oscar Cunningham $PA$ is equivalent to $ZF$ with the axiom of infinity replaced by its negation. That fact sort of fits in here.
Apr 26, 2017 at 14:58 answer added Stefan Mesken timeline score: 5
Apr 25, 2017 at 0:45 answer added Joel David Hamkins timeline score: 10
Apr 24, 2017 at 15:46 answer added Mohammad Golshani timeline score: 19
Apr 24, 2017 at 15:10 answer added Joel David Hamkins timeline score: 14
Apr 24, 2017 at 14:57 review First posts
Apr 24, 2017 at 15:04
Apr 24, 2017 at 14:56 history asked Neil Barton CC BY-SA 3.0