Timeline for "Ergodicity" of non-invariant product measures (with respect to the shift)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 9, 2017 at 1:48 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | Sorry. I can't because the counter-example was created specifically in response to this question. But: if you agree with the calculation that $f(T^n(x_0,x_1,\ldots))=\sin^2(2\pi x_n)\sin(2\pi x_{2^j})$ for all realizations $(x_0,x_1,\ldots)$ of the random vector $(X_0,X_1,\ldots)$, then the reason for the lack of convergence is that the average over the block $[2^{j-1},2^j)$ is close to $\frac 12\sin(2\pi x_{2^j})$; and as these blocks are doubling in length, brings the overall average towards that value; the next block brings the overall average towards $\frac 12\sin(2\pi x_{2^{j+1}})$ etc. | |
May 8, 2017 at 23:46 | comment | added | user127022 | could you perhaps point me to a reference where this (counter-)example appears in more detail? | |
Apr 28, 2017 at 3:43 | history | edited | Anthony Quas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Apr 28, 2017 at 3:42 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | Yes, absolutely. Thanks for the correction. | |
Apr 27, 2017 at 16:56 | comment | added | user127022 | Should it be $f(T^n(x_0,x_1,\dots)) = \sin^2(2\pi x_n)\sin(2\pi x_{2^j - \lfloor x_n\rfloor})$ for $x_n \in [2^{j-1}, 2^j)$? | |
Apr 24, 2017 at 5:51 | history | edited | Anthony Quas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 102 characters in body
|
Apr 23, 2017 at 22:15 | history | answered | Anthony Quas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |