Timeline for Slick construction of Hochschild complex
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2017 at 9:22 | vote | accept | HeinrichD | ||
| May 21, 2017 at 16:13 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 21, 2017 at 12:47 | comment | added | Dmitri Pavlov | Extracting a simplicial object in this case amounts to discarding data, I gave a few more details in my answer. | |
| Apr 21, 2017 at 12:45 | answer | added | Dmitri Pavlov | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 21, 2017 at 8:46 | comment | added | HeinrichD | @DmitriPavlov: can you be more specific? I am familar with these unbiased definitions, but nevertheless a slick construction of the Hochschild complex which only uses these definitions is unclear to me. So much for "triviality". | |
| Apr 21, 2017 at 8:37 | comment | added | Dmitri Pavlov | A modified version of Segal's Γ-objects and Δ-objects can be used to give an unbiased definition of rings and modules. Extracting a simplicial abelian group that defines the Hochschild complex is then a triviality. | |
| Apr 19, 2017 at 7:04 | history | asked | HeinrichD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |