Timeline for Peter-Weyl vs. Schur-Weyl theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 20, 2017 at 10:58 | comment | added | Allen Knutson | For the tensor algebra, you need to combine different $a$. Then, you're asking for a statement on $\bigoplus_a \mathcal O(M_{a\times b})$, as in why should that thing have another, noncommutative, multiplication. What seems more reasonable is that it have a comultiplication, i.e. $\coprod_a M_{a\times b}$ has a monoid operation "concatenate vertically". | |
Apr 19, 2017 at 9:00 | comment | added | Dan Petersen | I added a different answer to the question - if you have any input it would be appreciated! | |
Apr 19, 2017 at 5:28 | comment | added | Dan Petersen | Thanks, this is really helpful! So what you're saying is that $(\mathbb C^b)^{\otimes a} = \bigoplus_{\lambda \vdash a} \sigma_\lambda \otimes (\mathbb C^b)_\lambda$ sits inside of $\mathcal O(M_{a \times b}) = \bigoplus_{\lambda} (\mathbb C^a)_\lambda \otimes (\mathbb C^b)^\ast_\lambda$ in a nice and conceptual way that respects the decompositions. Is there a statement that also relates the multiplication in the tensor algebra and the multiplication in the coordinate ring? | |
Apr 19, 2017 at 5:19 | history | edited | Dan Petersen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Apr 19, 2017 at 4:35 | history | edited | Allen Knutson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 156 characters in body
|
Apr 19, 2017 at 4:13 | history | edited | Allen Knutson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 999 characters in body
|
Apr 19, 2017 at 0:25 | history | answered | Allen Knutson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |