Timeline for Does the number 1,23571113... has been studied before? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2017 at 0:00 | vote | accept | rafaelcastrocouto | ||
| Apr 19, 2017 at 23:08 | comment | added | Douglas Zare | Most primes have over a billion digits, so neither the first digit nor the last digit has much of an effect, and asymptotically the first and last digits have no effect. | |
| Apr 18, 2017 at 14:53 | history | closed |
Ira Gessel Stanley Yao Xiao YCor Carlo Beenakker Ilya Bogdanov |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Apr 18, 2017 at 14:14 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 18, 2017 at 14:53 | |||||
| Apr 18, 2017 at 14:09 | comment | added | rafaelcastrocouto | I thought Benford's law would make it not normal. and there is this nature.com/news/… ... anyway, thx Loreno | |
| Apr 18, 2017 at 14:05 | comment | added | Loreno Heer | and it is a normal number by the way | |
| Apr 18, 2017 at 14:04 | comment | added | Loreno Heer | The number is called Copeland–Erdős constant, and it has been studied before. | |
| Apr 18, 2017 at 14:04 | answer | added | rafaelcastrocouto | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 18, 2017 at 13:59 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 18, 2017 at 14:00 | |||||
| Apr 18, 2017 at 13:57 | comment | added | JMP | smarandache studies this sort of thing | |
| Apr 18, 2017 at 13:57 | comment | added | JMP | 1 isn't a prime number | |
| Apr 18, 2017 at 13:54 | history | asked | rafaelcastrocouto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |