Skip to main content

Timeline for When a PDE add a Laplacian term

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 20, 2017 at 16:08 comment added Delio Mugnolo Similarly, if you take a linear transport equation, it has hyperbolic nature. If you add a diffusive term, say $\epsilon\Delta$, then no matter how small $\epsilon>0$ is, the corresponing PDE will have parabolic nature. Understanding how the solutions to this regularized PDE converge as $\epsilon\to 0$ is a subtle issue, and all the more so if boundary conditios play a role (think of the number of necessary boundary conditions). On the other hand, if you perturb a bi-Laplacian $\Delta^2$ by a Laplacian, you surely won't get anything essentially different.
Apr 18, 2017 at 18:35 comment added Michał Miśkiewicz If you're looking for any example showing that adding a Laplacian term (even with a small coefficient) may change the game, see Burgers' equation. Googling "vanishing viscosity" might also be helpful.
Apr 18, 2017 at 9:12 comment added Ali Taghavi @qiewen I am interested in your question. Some how I encountered this concept in the comment conversation of this post: mathoverflow.net/questions/182415/…
Apr 18, 2017 at 3:19 comment added qie wen @WillieWong Thanks! I just updated the question.
Apr 18, 2017 at 2:52 history edited qie wen CC BY-SA 3.0
added 301 characters in body
Apr 18, 2017 at 2:38 comment added Willie Wong It would definitely depend on the context. Can you at the very least specify which equation you are talking about? For example, you can think of Navier-Stokes as "adding a Laplacian" to Euler's equations. That the regularity of Navier-Stokes is a Clay Problem is precisely because you cannot always say that the Laplacian will dominate!
Apr 18, 2017 at 2:19 review Close votes
Apr 18, 2017 at 11:08
Apr 18, 2017 at 1:52 review First posts
Apr 18, 2017 at 2:31
Apr 18, 2017 at 1:49 history asked qie wen CC BY-SA 3.0