Skip to main content
Notice removed Improve details by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Improve details by Ali Taghavi
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Ali Taghavi
deleted 5 characters in body
Source Link
Qfwfq
  • 23.3k
  • 14
  • 122
  • 225

Edit: I revise the question based on the comment conversations

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all equivalentequivalence classes of finite groups under the "Isomorphism" equivalentequivalence relation. We define a pseudo metric $d$ on $\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

$$d(G,H)= \inf \{Hd(\tilde {G}_{n},\tilde{H}_{n})\} $$

where $\inf$ takesis taken over all arbitrary isomorphic copy copies $\tilde{G}_{n}$ and $\tilde{H}_{n}$ of $G$ and $H$ in $Gl(n,\mathbb{R})$, respectively. Furthermore, while $Hd$ is the Hausdorff distanceHausdorff distance in $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ based on itsinduced by its standard left invariant metric.

The definition of this metric is motivated by the Hausdorff Gromov metric on the space of compact Riemannian manifolds.

Is $d$ a metric on $\mathcal{F}$? If the answer is yes, we denote by $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ the completion of $\mathcal{F}$. What can be said about an object $Z$ in $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Can one consider the unit circle, in some reasonable sense, as an objects object in this completion? Is there a natural group structure on every element $Z\in \bar{\mathcal{F}}$? Is there a natural topology on $Z$?

Is $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ a compact space?

Edit: I revise the question based on the comment conversations

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all equivalent classes of finite groups under the "Isomorphism" equivalent relation. We define a pseudo metric $d$ on $\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

$$d(G,H)= \inf \{Hd(\tilde {G}_{n},\tilde{H}_{n})\} $$

where $\inf$ takes over all arbitrary isomorphic copy $\tilde{G}_{n}$ and $\tilde{H}_{n}$ of $G$ and $H$ in $Gl(n,\mathbb{R})$, respectively. Furthermore $Hd$ is the Hausdorff distance in $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ based on its standard left invariant metric.

The definition of this metric is motivated by the Hausdorff Gromov metric on the space of compact Riemannian manifolds.

Is $d$ a metric on $\mathcal{F}$? If the answer is yes, we denote by $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ the completion of $\mathcal{F}$. What can be said about an object $Z$ in $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Can one consider the unit circle, in some reasonable sense, as an objects in this completion? Is there a natural group structure on every element $Z\in \bar{\mathcal{F}}$? Is there a natural topology on $Z$?

Is $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ a compact space?

Edit: I revise the question based on the comment conversations

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all equivalence classes of finite groups under the "Isomorphism" equivalence relation. We define a pseudo metric $d$ on $\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

$$d(G,H)= \inf \{Hd(\tilde {G}_{n},\tilde{H}_{n})\} $$

where $\inf$ is taken over all arbitrary isomorphic copies $\tilde{G}_{n}$ and $\tilde{H}_{n}$ of $G$ and $H$ in $Gl(n,\mathbb{R})$, respectively, while $Hd$ is the Hausdorff distance in $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ induced by its standard left invariant metric.

The definition of this metric is motivated by the Hausdorff Gromov metric on the space of compact Riemannian manifolds.

Is $d$ a metric on $\mathcal{F}$? If the answer is yes, we denote by $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ the completion of $\mathcal{F}$. What can be said about an object $Z$ in $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Can one consider the unit circle, in some reasonable sense, as an object in this completion? Is there a natural group structure on every element $Z\in \bar{\mathcal{F}}$? Is there a natural topology on $Z$?

Is $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ a compact space?

added 38 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

Edit: I revise the question based on the comment conversations

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all equivalent classes of finite groups under the "Isomorphism" equivalent relation. We define a pseudo metric $d$ on $\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

$$d(G,H)= \inf \{Hd(\tilde {G}_{n},\tilde{H}_{n})\} $$

where $\inf$ takes over all arbitrary isomorphic copy $\tilde{G}_{n}$ and $\tilde{H}_{n}$ of $G$ and $H$ in $Gl(n,\mathbb{R})$, respectively. Furthermore $Hd$ is the Hausdorff distance in $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ based on its standard left invariant metric.

The definition of this metric is motivated by the Hausdorff Gromov metric on the space of compact Riemannian manifolds.

Is $d$ a metric on $\mathcal{F}$? If the answer is yes, we denote by $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ the completion of $\mathcal{F}$. What can be said about an object $Z$ in $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Can one consider the unit circle, in some reasonable sense, as an objects in this completion.? Is there a natural group structure on every element $Z\in \bar{\mathcal{F}}$? Is there a natural topology on $Z$?

Is $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ a compact space?

Edit: I revise the question based on the comment conversations

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all equivalent classes of finite groups under the "Isomorphism" equivalent relation. We define a pseudo metric $d$ on $\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

$$d(G,H)= \inf \{Hd(\tilde {G}_{n},\tilde{H}_{n})\} $$

where $\inf$ takes over all arbitrary isomorphic copy $\tilde{G}_{n}$ and $\tilde{H}_{n}$ of $G$ and $H$ in $Gl(n,\mathbb{R})$, respectively. Furthermore $Hd$ is the Hausdorff distance in $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ based on its standard left invariant metric.

The definition of this metric is motivated by the Hausdorff Gromov metric on the space of compact Riemannian manifolds.

Is $d$ a metric on $\mathcal{F}$? If the answer is yes, we denote by $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ the completion of $\mathcal{F}$. What can be said about an object $Z$ in $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Can one consider the unit circle, in some reasonable sense, as an objects in this completion. Is there a natural group structure on every element $Z\in \bar{\mathcal{F}}$? Is there a natural topology on $Z$?

Is $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ a compact space?

Edit: I revise the question based on the comment conversations

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all equivalent classes of finite groups under the "Isomorphism" equivalent relation. We define a pseudo metric $d$ on $\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

$$d(G,H)= \inf \{Hd(\tilde {G}_{n},\tilde{H}_{n})\} $$

where $\inf$ takes over all arbitrary isomorphic copy $\tilde{G}_{n}$ and $\tilde{H}_{n}$ of $G$ and $H$ in $Gl(n,\mathbb{R})$, respectively. Furthermore $Hd$ is the Hausdorff distance in $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ based on its standard left invariant metric.

The definition of this metric is motivated by the Hausdorff Gromov metric on the space of compact Riemannian manifolds.

Is $d$ a metric on $\mathcal{F}$? If the answer is yes, we denote by $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ the completion of $\mathcal{F}$. What can be said about an object $Z$ in $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Can one consider the unit circle, in some reasonable sense, as an objects in this completion? Is there a natural group structure on every element $Z\in \bar{\mathcal{F}}$? Is there a natural topology on $Z$?

Is $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ a compact space?

added 38 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

**Edit:**IEdit: I revise the question based on the comment conversations

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all equivalent classes of finite groups under the "Isomorphism" equivalent relation. We define a pseudo metric $d$ on $\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

$$d(G,H)= \inf \{Hd(\tilde {G}_{n},\tilde{H}_{n})\} $$

where $\inf$ takes over all arbitrary isomorphic copy $\tilde{G}_{n}$ and $\tilde{H}_{n}$ of $G$ and $H$ in $Gl(n,\mathbb{R})$, respectively. Furthermore $Hd$ is the Hausdorff distance in $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ based on its standard left invariant metric.

The definition of this metric is motivated by the Hausdorff Gromov metric on the space of compact Riemannian manifolds.

Is $d$ a metric on $\mathcal{F}$? If the answer is yes, we denote by $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ the completion of $\mathcal{F}$. What can be said about an object $Z$ in $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Can one consider the unit circle, in some reasonable sense, as an objects in this completion. Is there a natural group structure on every element $Z\in \bar{\mathcal{F}}$? Is there a natural topology on $Z$?

Is $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ a compact space?

**Edit:**I revise the question based on the comment conversations

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all equivalent classes of finite groups under the "Isomorphism" equivalent relation. We define a pseudo metric $d$ on $\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

$$d(G,H)= \inf \{Hd(\tilde {G}_{n},\tilde{H}_{n})\} $$

where $\inf$ takes over all arbitrary isomorphic copy $\tilde{G}_{n}$ and $\tilde{H}_{n}$ of $G$ and $H$ in $Gl(n,\mathbb{R})$, respectively. Furthermore $Hd$ is the Hausdorff distance in $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ based on its standard left invariant metric.

The definition of this metric is motivated by the Hausdorff Gromov metric on the space of compact Riemannian manifolds.

Is $d$ a metric on $\mathcal{F}$? If the answer is yes, we denote by $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ the completion of $\mathcal{F}$. What can be said about an object $Z$ in $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Can one consider the unit circle, in some reasonable sense, as an objects in this completion. Is there a natural group structure on every element $Z\in \bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Is $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ a compact space?

Edit: I revise the question based on the comment conversations

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all equivalent classes of finite groups under the "Isomorphism" equivalent relation. We define a pseudo metric $d$ on $\mathcal{F}$ as follows:

$$d(G,H)= \inf \{Hd(\tilde {G}_{n},\tilde{H}_{n})\} $$

where $\inf$ takes over all arbitrary isomorphic copy $\tilde{G}_{n}$ and $\tilde{H}_{n}$ of $G$ and $H$ in $Gl(n,\mathbb{R})$, respectively. Furthermore $Hd$ is the Hausdorff distance in $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ based on its standard left invariant metric.

The definition of this metric is motivated by the Hausdorff Gromov metric on the space of compact Riemannian manifolds.

Is $d$ a metric on $\mathcal{F}$? If the answer is yes, we denote by $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ the completion of $\mathcal{F}$. What can be said about an object $Z$ in $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$?

Can one consider the unit circle, in some reasonable sense, as an objects in this completion. Is there a natural group structure on every element $Z\in \bar{\mathcal{F}}$? Is there a natural topology on $Z$?

Is $\bar{\mathcal{F}}$ a compact space?

added 108 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
added 6 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
added 33 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
added 113 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
added 137 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading