Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
added 470 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

Special cases of the Kimura-O’Sullivan conjecture, i.e., examples of finite dimensional motives?

What is the current stateIn this 2005 paper, Kimura introduces a notion of knowledge aboutfinite dimensionality for Chow motives satisfying, defined in terms of vanishing of high symmetric and wedge powers. Toward the end of his paper, he conjectures that the Chow motive $h(X)$ of any smooth variety $X$ is finite dimensional [Conjecture 7.1]. The (more general?) Kimura-O’Sullivan conjecture? I know states that every Chow motive is finite dimensional.

In his paper, Kimura proves that Chow motives of smooth projective curves are finite dimensional [Corollary 4.4] and that tensor products of finite dimensional motives are finite dimensional [Corollary 5.11]. What is the current state of knowledge about Chow motives satisfying the Kimura-O’Sullivan conjecture? More specifically:

Q1. What other specific Chow motives are known to be finite dimensional?

Q2. What other constructions from finite dimensional Chow motives are known to return finite dimensional Chow motives?

Q3. I would expect that for any finite surjective map $f:X\longrightarrow Y$ of smooth proper $k$-schemes over a fixed field $k$, if the Chow motive $h(Y)$ is finite dimensional, then the Chow motive $h(X)$ is also finite dimensional. Is there an obvious way to see this? Is this known? (If I understand correctly, the dual statement minus the finiteness assumption — the statement that if $h(X)$ is finite dimensional and $f$ is surjective then $h(Y)$ is finite dimensional — is Proposition 6.9 in Kimura's original paper.)

Special cases of the Kimura-O’Sullivan conjecture?

What is the current state of knowledge about Chow motives satisfying the Kimura-O’Sullivan conjecture? I know that Chow motives of smooth projective curves are finite dimensional and that tensor products of finite dimensional motives are finite dimensional.

Q1. What other specific Chow motives are known to be finite dimensional?

Q2. What other constructions from finite dimensional Chow motives are known to return finite dimensional Chow motives?

Q3. I would expect that for any finite surjective map $f:X\longrightarrow Y$ of smooth proper $k$-schemes over a fixed field $k$, if the Chow motive $h(Y)$ is finite dimensional, then the Chow motive $h(X)$ is also finite dimensional. Is there an obvious way to see this? Is this known? (If I understand correctly, the dual statement minus the finiteness assumption — the statement that if $h(X)$ is finite dimensional and $f$ is surjective then $h(Y)$ is finite dimensional — is Proposition 6.9 in Kimura's original paper.)

Special cases of the Kimura-O’Sullivan conjecture, i.e., examples of finite dimensional motives?

In this 2005 paper, Kimura introduces a notion of finite dimensionality for Chow motives, defined in terms of vanishing of high symmetric and wedge powers. Toward the end of his paper, he conjectures that the Chow motive $h(X)$ of any smooth variety $X$ is finite dimensional [Conjecture 7.1]. The (more general?) Kimura-O’Sullivan conjecture states that every Chow motive is finite dimensional.

In his paper, Kimura proves that Chow motives of smooth projective curves are finite dimensional [Corollary 4.4] and that tensor products of finite dimensional motives are finite dimensional [Corollary 5.11]. What is the current state of knowledge about Chow motives satisfying the Kimura-O’Sullivan conjecture? More specifically:

Q1. What other specific Chow motives are known to be finite dimensional?

Q2. What other constructions from finite dimensional Chow motives are known to return finite dimensional Chow motives?

Q3. I would expect that for any finite surjective map $f:X\longrightarrow Y$ of smooth proper $k$-schemes over a fixed field $k$, if the Chow motive $h(Y)$ is finite dimensional, then the Chow motive $h(X)$ is also finite dimensional. Is there an obvious way to see this? Is this known? (If I understand correctly, the dual statement minus the finiteness assumption — the statement that if $h(X)$ is finite dimensional and $f$ is surjective then $h(Y)$ is finite dimensional — is Proposition 6.9 in Kimura's paper.)

edited tags
Link
Source Link
Loading