Timeline for Explicit description (=pictures!) of elements in $Mod_g[k]$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2017 at 4:21 | comment | added | Andy Putman | I don't know any other systematic way to find elements, though it is not hard to find various ad-hoc constructions of elements that are at least not obviously in the kth term of the lcs. | |
| Apr 16, 2017 at 3:53 | comment | added | Nati | I have one additional question: you mentioned "best way to find explicit elements" is by taking iterated commutators of BP's or separating twists. That's actually the only way I'm aware of ... is there another explicit construction? | |
| Apr 16, 2017 at 1:10 | vote | accept | Nati | ||
| Apr 16, 2017 at 1:10 | comment | added | Nati | Wow, that's a very extensive answer :-) , thanks Andy! | |
| Apr 14, 2017 at 22:45 | history | edited | Andy Putman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 86 characters in body
|
| Apr 14, 2017 at 22:37 | history | answered | Andy Putman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |