Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 12, 2017 at 11:46 comment added Vincent I'd like to use the sudden interest in this question to generate some overflow interest into a different but similar question on MSE: math.stackexchange.com/q/2221362/101420 from a few days ago. It is not mine, but I am still curious to see an answer.
Apr 11, 2017 at 10:52 review Close votes
Apr 11, 2017 at 13:19
Apr 10, 2017 at 19:36 vote accept Tom Solberg
Apr 10, 2017 at 19:35 answer added Will Brian timeline score: 66
Apr 10, 2017 at 19:34 comment added Denis T As you tagged this as AG, I guess you may be interested in some works of Vladlen Timorin, who wrote a few papers on classification of $\mathbb {RP}^n$ selfmaps taking lines into plane curves of some degree. See arxiv.org/abs/math/0212098 and later.
Apr 10, 2017 at 19:33 comment added Neal Maybe some interesting related questions are: For which $\mathcal{S}$ does this proposition hold, where $\mathcal{S}$ is the set of boundaries of some class of convex bodies? Is number of intersection points the only obstruction?
Apr 10, 2017 at 19:29 answer added amakelov timeline score: 8
Apr 10, 2017 at 19:27 comment added Denis T I guess any two circles have 1, 2 or infinitely many common points, whereas squares can intersect in 4 points.
Apr 10, 2017 at 19:27 comment added amakelov You can have two squares that intersect at 8 points (for example - take two congruent squares on top of each other and rotate by $45^\circ$ around their common center. Under the inverse of such a bijection, your squares would have to go to two distinct circles with 8 common points, which is impossible.
Apr 10, 2017 at 19:17 history asked Tom Solberg CC BY-SA 3.0