Timeline for Is there any concise sufficient condition for the dual space to have Kadec property?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2017 at 23:01 | comment | added | erz | @AugustCleaner: I don't really mean anything specific. Maybe something quantitative like some strong smoothness of the norm, or maybe some reflexivity-like condition. Anything would do, I just get a feeling that the uniform smoothness is too much. | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 17:32 | comment | added | August Cleaner | I think that you need to clarify: What do you mean by a "more readily verifiable condition"? | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 7:42 | history | edited | erz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body; edited title
|
| S Apr 9, 2017 at 6:53 | history | suggested | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo in the title
|
| Apr 9, 2017 at 6:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 9, 2017 at 6:53 | |||||
| Apr 9, 2017 at 6:41 | history | asked | erz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |