Timeline for The role of Honda-Tate theory in (Scholze's refinement of) the Langlands-Kottwitz method?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2017 at 21:35 | comment | added | Anonymous Google Document Anim | Sorry, I phrased my question poorly. I've edited what I've said in light of what you said @KeerthiMadapusiPera. | |
| Mar 29, 2017 at 21:35 | history | edited | Anonymous Google Document Anim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 29, 2017 at 13:29 | history | edited | Anonymous Google Document Anim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 14 characters in body
|
| Mar 29, 2017 at 4:09 | comment | added | Keerthi Madapusi | The application of Honda-Tate theory to point counting goes back at least to Kottwitz himself. Scholze's main insight has little do with this, but rather with noticing that it is possible to compute the nearby cycle cohomology of modular curves at primes of bad reduction via point counting on models with good reduction, and via a general theorem about nearby cycles for regular schemes. In any case, there are somewhat legible notes on the topic here: fields.utoronto.ca/programs/scientific/11-12/galoisrep/… | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 21:55 | history | edited | Anonymous Google Document Anim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2017 at 21:44 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 28, 2017 at 21:45 | |||||
| Mar 28, 2017 at 21:43 | history | asked | Anonymous Google Document Anim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |