Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 21, 2018 at 9:07 vote accept Severin
Mar 31, 2017 at 17:32 comment added Venkataramana The question amounts to asking if there is a $g$ invariant nonzero vector in in the triple tensor product $V^* \otimes W\otimes g$. This is equivalent to whether $V$ occurs in $W\otimes g$. IF $W$ has highest weight $\lambda$ and $g$ has highest weight $\alpha$ (the highest root), then $V=V(\lambda + \alpha)$ the rep with highest weight $\lambda +\alpha$ occurs in $W\otimes g$. Thus $V$ and $W$ are not self dual.
Mar 31, 2017 at 15:54 comment added Venkataramana If $g$ (the simple Lie algebra ) acts irreducibly on $V$ and $V$ has dimension more than one, then there is an inclusion $g\rightarrow End(V)=V\otimes V^*$. Hence the adjoint representation does embed in $V\otimes V^*$. So at least half of the question has yes as an answer.
Mar 29, 2017 at 9:55 comment added Vincent Aargh, yes, my bad. 0 or 2 I meant. However the SL2 case may not be very representative for the general case anyway.
Mar 28, 2017 at 16:17 comment added Jim Humphreys @Vincent: The criterion "at most 2" doesn't seem to work, e.g., when the difference is 1.
Mar 28, 2017 at 16:11 answer added Jim Humphreys timeline score: 5
Mar 28, 2017 at 9:41 comment added Vincent The $SL_2$ case mentioned by user44191 above can be generalized by stating that the difference in dimension between $\sigma$ and $\rho$ must be at most 2 and that this is both necessary and sufficient, see this MSE answer: math.stackexchange.com/a/95882/101420. The general case is harder, I believe.
Mar 28, 2017 at 8:40 comment added user44191 For a less trivial example, take the 2 and 4 dimensional representations of $SL_2$; their tensor product decomposes into the 3 dimensional representation and the 5 dimensional representation, and the 3 dimensional representation is the adjoint representation.
Mar 28, 2017 at 8:39 comment added user44191 It is not true that they have to be dual; there is the trivial example where $\rho$ is the trivial representation and $\sigma$ is itself the adjoint representation. In fact, the condition that the two be dual is equivalent to the inclusion of the trivial representation, not the adjoint representation.
Mar 28, 2017 at 8:06 review First posts
Mar 28, 2017 at 8:45
Mar 28, 2017 at 8:05 history asked Severin CC BY-SA 3.0