Timeline for Why is the Hahn-Banach theorem so important?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 9 at 13:52 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
added the tag (hahn-banach-theorem)
|
|
Sep 17, 2017 at 14:44 | history | edited | Denis Serre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Sep 14, 2017 at 23:03 | history | reopened |
Francois Ziegler Lucia Pablo Shmerkin Andrés E. Caicedo user6976 |
||
Sep 14, 2017 at 18:36 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Sep 14, 2017 at 23:03 | |||||
Sep 14, 2017 at 17:50 | history | edited | coudy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected typographical error in title.
|
Jul 8, 2010 at 14:29 | comment | added | Kevin O'Bryant | If this were open, I'd add a link to Joel's answer to this question: mathoverflow.net/questions/17964/… | |
Jun 2, 2010 at 0:54 | comment | added | Dan Piponi | FAQ says "research level math questions". This is certainly a question I asked myself while doing research. | |
Jun 1, 2010 at 7:06 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | Meta thread: tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/418/… | |
Jun 1, 2010 at 5:22 | comment | added | Halfdan Faber | Please reopen. Too much interest, and too many good answers to remain closed. | |
May 31, 2010 at 23:52 | comment | added | KConrad | Noah: OK, done. | |
May 31, 2010 at 23:36 | comment | added | Pietro | I add my modest vote to reopen the question! | |
May 31, 2010 at 22:07 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | I voted to reopen as there seems to be a lot of people who want it open and Scott you didn't explain why you closed it. Keith, you're over 3K, so if you think it should be reopened then vote to reopen. | |
May 31, 2010 at 21:05 | comment | added | Andrej Bauer | This is a real question, if for no other reason because it has good answers. Please reopen it. | |
May 31, 2010 at 20:30 | comment | added | KConrad | How can this be considered not a real (pun intended) question? Not everyone reading this site has necessarily learned functional analysis. If someone asked here why the fundamental theorem of calculus is important, that's below the level of the site, but a major theorem in advanced mathematics? Please reopen. | |
May 31, 2010 at 18:36 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | if this is not a real question, I'm a ghost | |
May 31, 2010 at 17:49 | comment | added | Guntram | I strongly recommend to reopen the question. | |
May 31, 2010 at 15:44 | history | closed |
Harry Gindi Andrew Stacey Kim Morrison |
not a real question | |
May 31, 2010 at 15:33 | answer | added | gowers | timeline score: 54 | |
May 31, 2010 at 15:00 | answer | added | Yiftach Barnea | timeline score: 8 | |
May 31, 2010 at 14:30 | answer | added | BS. | timeline score: 9 | |
May 31, 2010 at 13:55 | answer | added | coudy | timeline score: 34 | |
May 31, 2010 at 13:22 | answer | added | KP Hart | timeline score: 4 | |
May 31, 2010 at 13:00 | answer | added | Charles Matthews | timeline score: 9 | |
May 31, 2010 at 12:48 | answer | added | Randomblue | timeline score: 21 | |
May 31, 2010 at 12:43 | history | asked | teil | CC BY-SA 2.5 |